Tuesday, March 24, 2020

Changing the Medical Conversation

Image result for rising to the challenge

Dealing with Covid-19 has been a stress on medical providers.  Retirees like me are dormant, and maybe even regret not being in the fray.  It has changed the conversation of medicine for the better, though.  We'll start with Provider.  The Flexner Report, not yet fully of Blessed Memory, purged practitioners of lesser training and instituted licensing and credentialing.  Physicians often resent parity with other practitioners for understandable reasons.  But with stresses on caring for high volumes of sick patients, a willingness to work and threshold of skill rises in importance.  Doctors get the most attention but good medical care also depends on nurses, technicians, housekeepers with their disinfectants and secretaries to direct patients to the right place and assure their appointments.  They are at personal risk and often have young families.  In a crisis we are all providers with a much flattened hierarchy.

As a reader of social media, medical and otherwise, the conversation in the charting rooms and doctors' lounges no longer focuses on the devaluation of physicians.  Those reviled dysfunctional EHR's have not gone away.  Eventually somebody will get back to our metrics and RBVU's.  But for now we are focused on good outcomes for patients.  Not just the doctors but the managers.  We are all rowing our canoes in the right direction.  Professional antagonism, even animosity sometimes, no longer appears in the physician restricted or public postings.  As we watch TV, we wish there was a Gong to get the President off the podium so we can hear from the learned doctor instead.  People have better priorities from this health stressor, both in public and in private.

Like most calamities other than the extinction of the dinosaurs, Covid-19 will one day pass from the forefront to fond anecdotes and ultimately to the history books.  It remains to be determined if the professional nobility of thought and expression will remain.  But for now we can admire those doing their best to mitigate our crisis and take comfort in knowing that our loftiest doctors can rise in stature above all others.

Monday, March 9, 2020

Not on Weekly Schedule

Every Sunday I outline my weekly schedule on a white board.  If it's a day ending in zero other than Shabbos, Sermo gets a notation in green marker, though not this week.  I'm just no longer interested. 

It's not the first social media that I've abandoned.  There was a great site called classmates.com, great only if free, that predated Facebook.  I reconnected with a lot of the old crowd that way, dumped en mass when a fee was added.  I used to chat with the 40-somethings every morning and some Jewish group chat in the evening.  Screeches from Abdul were worthy of mass use of the Ignore option but enough participants preferred to engage him and the site no longer was attractive.  Physicians Online introduced me to cyberspace.  They had a physicians chat or posting room.  It did not take long for it to appear as a talk radio echo chamber.  As Physicians Online became Medscape, they made a business decision to abolish the service rather than police it.

Sermo once served as a daily destination, a place to make virtual friends.  It took longer for the echo chamber to take over, but it eventually did.  My sign-in dwindled from daily to dates that end in zero but until now remained on schedule.  The new format did not help, hard to navigate, more international posters with concerns different from American physicians, and most importantly, lacking the sharp analytical minds.  Just not on this week's weekly planning.  Not interesting and really not interactive, which could take the mundane on more intriguing directions.  But they still do not charge a fee.  I'd have been gone long ago if they did.

Image result for sermo

Wednesday, March 4, 2020

Inundated by Covid-19

Image result for covid-19


Last time I got in on the ground floor of a new disease, AIDS, I completely missed the boat.  I saw early AIDS as a VA hospitalist, not so much as an endocrinologist, so I never really learned its management except as related to adapting endocrine drugs.

Ebola, West Nile, SARS all passed me by professionally.

Now we have a new infection, a serious one, that dominates the news.  It is far rarer than things that I really see like diabetes, hypothyroidism, opioid OD's and respiratory infections of mostly non covid-19 pathogens.  Since nobody's really an expert, most of all the President and VP, it is another chance to enter on the ground floor of a new disease.  Too many distractions for me to become more than a novice at this one too.  But at least I should be able to master the classification of the respiratory viruses and get a better grasp of epidemiology this time.

Monday, March 2, 2020

Too Anemic

Image result for platelet donation

For only the second time in decades as a platelet donor, my willingness to provide for the chemotherapy recipients got turned down.  My first exclusion came about fifteen years ago following a stop in Belize on a cruise ship.  I stayed in the tourist area, climbed a Mayan pyramid and lifted the cap off a bottle of local beer.  If Belize had malaria, which the screeners at the blood center told me it did, I didn't come across anyone febrile.  I let the requisite time pass and resumed schedule.  While there have been a few aborted donations trying to use a single arm, I've always passed the screening until this morning.  Random tabletop Hb estimates 12.9g/dl and 12.5g/dl, below the screening cutoff of 13.  I felt fine, would probably have a higher Hb at the end since they take off plasma but return RBC but it was my first health related no go.  A second try in about 10 days.  This has been one of my prime activities for many years, recently increased in frequency after retirement, and one of the few opportunities to literally give a piece of me for the benefit of somebody unknown.  A piece of my identity that I don't want to lose.  Maybe a better result next time.